Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:37:20
Message-Id: 20110213193440.475debea@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item by Pacho Ramos
1 On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:31:23 +0100
2 Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
3 > Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to
4 > default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS
5 > is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS="*"
6 > shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually
7 > add all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view)
8
9 Why not specify all the CAMERAS you know about as being on by default in
10 the profile? Users who care enough can override this with an explicit
11 subset.
12
13 --
14 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@g.o>