1 |
On 22 June 2010 15:32, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Arun Raghavan posted on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:43:42 +0530 as excerpted: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> b) For questions like "- Should Python 3.x be stable?", isn't that for |
5 |
>> team leads to decide? And for the council to resolve in case of |
6 |
>> conflicts? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Wouldn't the point for specifically pointing out python 3.x as an example, |
9 |
> that there is in fact quite some conflict on it, as demonstrated by the |
10 |
> threads discussing it right here? If I'm not mistaken, sping has in fact |
11 |
> mentioned that as an example in his "tone" thread, as well. If I read him |
12 |
> correctly, the implication is that before it got to the level it did, |
13 |
> council should have voted on it, thus providing a final answer, as an |
14 |
> alternative to the simmering level of discontent that's not quite at the |
15 |
> boiling over point, that we seem to have with the situation now. He does, |
16 |
> after all, make a strong statement in favor of an "activist" council. |
17 |
|
18 |
I did say questions like this one, not only this one. |
19 |
|
20 |
Also, the context of that quote was from the bit of the manifesto that |
21 |
advocates putting such questions to a global vote, which is what I was |
22 |
enquiring about. |
23 |
|
24 |
Cheers, |
25 |
-- |
26 |
Arun Raghavan |
27 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
28 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |