| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ok that somewhat explains what 'desktop' is... But what has the *discussion* |
| 5 |
been discussing? :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Friday 29 August 2003 02:06 pm, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
| 8 |
> Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o> said: |
| 9 |
> > Could someone summarize this thread please? I'm somewhat interested in |
| 10 |
> > the discussion, but don't really have time to go through reading all 50 |
| 11 |
> > or so new messages... o.o;; |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> summary attempt (please correct me if we still don't agree) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> desktop will handle the desktop component. It'll try to stick with vanilla |
| 16 |
> desktops as much as possible, but provide good default, and uniformization |
| 17 |
> when it's possible and non-intrusive. In all case, additions should be |
| 18 |
> easily (un)pluggable. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> About non visible stuff, desktop will try to make things work out of the |
| 21 |
> box. Ie, addapt config/default data so that they better interact with |
| 22 |
> gentoo core system. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Some questions to answer : |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> - do we want X in desktop or in base or elsewhere? it seems we tend to put |
| 27 |
> X in base, but not included in default system |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> - should we have rules to decide if such modification will change the DE |
| 30 |
> too much from vanilla state? |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> - probably other things, but my head is in a bad state right now |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
- -- |
| 35 |
Luke-Jr |
| 36 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 37 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 38 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
iD4DBQE/T2DFZl/BHdU+lYMRAs++AJiMQdQA2aQxWRqaqeuO22/77AARAJkBj1TW |
| 42 |
lVvuVtDKyOpkMMYfonAZIA== |
| 43 |
=pCiP |
| 44 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives