Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:46:36
Message-Id: ga46f5$4kj$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) by Joe Peterson
1 Joe Peterson wrote:
2
3 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 >> Except it doesn't. A virtual ebuild:
5 >>
6 >> * installs nothing
7 >> * does nothing
8 >
9 > I'd say that virtual does indeed do something: it pulls in other packages.
10 >
11 >> * should be treated as being very quickly installable
12 >> * should be treated as having zero cost for installs
13 >>
14 Both of which follow from "installs nothing." Or would you disagree?
15
16 >> The property proposed corresponds to only the last of these.
17 >
18 > Still, the term "virtual" fits the spirit of the idea well.
19 >
20 Indeed, and it is well-understood.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>