Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120524140343.6fb3fc12@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Dirkjan Ochtman |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:50 +0200 |
| 2 | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 4 | > > In that regard, git is nothing like for instance svn, where |
| 5 | > > branches come at a much higher cost, as does merging between them. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > That's wrong. SVN branches are just about as cheap as git branches, |
| 8 | |
| 9 | [citation needed] |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |