1 |
On 26 August 2013 19:55, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> El lun, 26-08-2013 a las 09:38 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I would open a bug and try to contact the developer. Not sure if |
7 |
> internal functions could be named in a "standard" way allowing repoman |
8 |
> to die on its usage by ebuilds :/ |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
This really resonates my continued desire to be able to add QA checks to |
12 |
repoman without needing to modify the repoman code. I know Repoman already |
13 |
has a whole lot of eclass-based checks, but they appear to be hardcoded in |
14 |
the checks themselves ( repoman/checks.py ), which means to simply enforce |
15 |
some degree of sane usage of an eclass, one has to modify portage itself to |
16 |
add the checks.. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Kent |