Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with people who use internal eclass functions?
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:12:10
Message-Id: CAATnKFAub3ZWvgU3otbeZK1u8LiKBbZdN1ja-DF60rQcyHU=hQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with people who use internal eclass functions? by Pacho Ramos
1 On 26 August 2013 19:55, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > El lun, 26-08-2013 a las 09:38 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
4 >
5 >
6 > I would open a bug and try to contact the developer. Not sure if
7 > internal functions could be named in a "standard" way allowing repoman
8 > to die on its usage by ebuilds :/
9 >
10 >
11 This really resonates my continued desire to be able to add QA checks to
12 repoman without needing to modify the repoman code. I know Repoman already
13 has a whole lot of eclass-based checks, but they appear to be hardcoded in
14 the checks themselves ( repoman/checks.py ), which means to simply enforce
15 some degree of sane usage of an eclass, one has to modify portage itself to
16 add the checks..
17
18
19
20 --
21 Kent