1 |
2009/11/29 Thomas Anderson <tanderson@g.o>: |
2 |
> I can see people using qt4-r2 just because it has -r2 (so it is newer |
3 |
> than qt4) |
4 |
|
5 |
That is exactly the intended behaviour. We would break the tree if we would |
6 |
simply add the new functionality to the existing qt4.eclass. And in absence |
7 |
of an eclass versioning mechanism, this is what we came up with. As soon |
8 |
as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the old |
9 |
qt4.eclass will |
10 |
be removed. |
11 |
|
12 |
Cheers, |
13 |
-- |
14 |
Ben de Groot |
15 |
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) |
16 |
______________________________________________________ |