Archives
Archives
| From: | David Seifert <soap@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain.eclass prefix support | ||
| Date: | Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:38:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1483803443.26410.1.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain.eclass prefix support by Benda Xu |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 00:25 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 2 | > James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> writes: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > > Why? All the ebuilds using this eclass that I can find are at least |
| 5 | > > EAPI 4. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Okay! I will remove this. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Benda |
| 10 | |
| 11 | https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/eapi-per-eclass/toolchain.eclass/S |
| 12 | TATS.txt |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Chewi seems right, no use in defining them. |