From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem | ||
Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:55:06 | ||
Message-Id: | 4E08A78E.10607@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] The Python problem by Dirkjan Ochtman |
1 | On 27.06.2011 15:28, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to |
4 | > know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the |
5 | > Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a |
6 | > number of other issues? |
7 | > |
8 | |
9 | I like the ruby approach for the reason that it doesn't require users to |
10 | run update scripts like python-updater. |
11 | |
12 | Regards, |
13 | Petteri |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> |