Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: foser <foser@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:15:31
Message-Id: 1145373225.18478.51.camel@rivendell
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > dont know what policy you're referring to seeing as how we dont have any
3 > concerning unmaintained packages
4
5 Still hiding... c'mon you are better than this.
6
7 > sure, for new packages ... cccc isnt a new package
8
9 The policy concerning metadata makes no difference between
10 new/(un)maintained. It just says that every package should have one. So
11 if you come across a pack that doesn't and you touch it, you need to fix
12 that.
13
14 - foser

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature