| 1 |
On 07/12/2010 10:18 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 2 |
> Rationale: Meeting summary for 20091012 is "to be completed". Meeting |
| 3 |
> summary for 20100419 is also "to be completed", and all following |
| 4 |
> council meetings lack summaries. This makes it hard to follow the |
| 5 |
> council's work. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I've seen this at work quite a bit. I've also seen an elegant solution |
| 8 |
that works moderately well. The minutes of the meeting are taken in |
| 9 |
realtime during the meeting by whoever will take it, and this is shared |
| 10 |
with the participants in realtime. This way errors in the minutes are |
| 11 |
instantly corrected. When the meeting is done you just save and publish |
| 12 |
the minutes and you are done. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Realtime collaboration could involve any number of mechanisms. I don't |
| 15 |
know if google docs supports it, but I imagine Wave would. There might |
| 16 |
be other mechanisms as well. Webex/GotoMeeting/etc are usually the |
| 17 |
methods employed in the business world. There might be an FOSS equivalent. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I think this should be purely up to the council's discretion, but I |
| 20 |
wanted to offer this as a suggestion. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm not a fan of slacker marks in the first place - but, if you have to |
| 23 |
have them then I'd do it in a way so as to avoid creating a negative |
| 24 |
incentive for volunteering to do the work in the first place. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives