1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
5 |
> So, only this reply. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> May I conclude that nobody objects to the above? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Ulrich |
10 |
|
11 |
Wearing only my perl team hat, it would seem to lowly me that if a |
12 |
virtual points to packages foo and bar, and both foo and bar were tested |
13 |
and marked stable by the arch's previously, that its silly to then wait |
14 |
for them to mark the virtual stable as well, since at least in my |
15 |
perception the only function of that virtual is to say use one of these |
16 |
packages - which have already been marked stable. |
17 |
|
18 |
/me hopes some arch brains step in, like weeve in particular, who is |
19 |
usually far more eloquent at defending an arch's position |
20 |
|
21 |
- -- |
22 |
|
23 |
- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
24 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
25 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
26 |
Gentoo/SPARC |
27 |
Gentoo/AMD64 |
28 |
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
29 |
- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) |
32 |
|
33 |
iD8DBQFGXpVDq1ztTp5/Ti4RAn3fAJ93fLU/G2QOB5p6jeGQst4lnyXEWgCfeuPg |
34 |
kQDUKObUWKYcIWndm6zGm6U= |
35 |
=beGq |
36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |