1 |
> It doesn't ignore what the user wants. It just doesn't look where you |
2 |
> think it should. |
3 |
|
4 |
I don't see the difference... |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
> If someone really wants to use newer packages to bootstrap, they can |
8 |
> edit the packages file in their profile. Otherwise things can |
9 |
> potentially break and we get more bug reports. |
10 |
|
11 |
Of course things can break. Even "stable" packages break sometimes. And |
12 |
of course there will be bug reports. Ain't that an important (and |
13 |
desired) part of the Gentoo development process? To know what does and |
14 |
what does not work together? And find out the reason when they don't? |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
> if you want |
18 |
> to tune your settings for bootstrap, do it in places other than |
19 |
> make.conf and don't file bug reports if something breaks in the process. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Users can do anything they want in make.conf after bootstapping. |
22 |
|
23 |
In <http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86-install.xml>, step 11 is |
24 |
where I set up my make.conf, and step 12 is where bootstraping takes |
25 |
place. I see no reason for step 12 to ignore what was set up in step 11. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
Also, please read comment #3 in the bug report I cited earlier: |
29 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11374#c3 |
30 |
It contains many of the reasons why I believe make.conf should _never_ |
31 |
be ignored. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
Felipe Ghellar |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
_______________________________________________________________________ |
40 |
Busca Yahoo! |
41 |
O serviço de busca mais completo da Internet. O que você pensar o Yahoo! encontra. |
42 |
http://br.busca.yahoo.com/ |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |