| 1 |
The gcc manual is the place to look. If you do a google earch you should find |
| 2 |
some good links too If you're after athlon specifics it has to be a gcc-3.x |
| 3 |
manual athlon optimizations weren't introduced until then. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Tue, 28 May 2002 10:37, Bill Kenworthy wrote: |
| 6 |
> I see an occaisional message with "odd" make flags like this one with |
| 7 |
> 3dnow. Is there a comprehensive list hidden somewhere? I am |
| 8 |
> particularly interested in athlon ones, for gcc-2.95, at least until |
| 9 |
> gcc3 builds become feasable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> BillK |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 03:18, Webmaster Refstart.NL wrote: |
| 14 |
> > Hi all, |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > I try to set up a GCC 3.1 based Gentoo system with binutils 2.12. When I |
| 17 |
> > try to run ./scripts/bootstrap in the directory /usr/portage, I get |
| 18 |
> > errors when compiling glibc (sorry, I can't c/p the output). I've the |
| 19 |
> > following compile flags in /etc/make.conf: |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > CHOST = i686-pc-linux-gnu |
| 22 |
> > CXXFLAGS = -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe |
| 23 |
> > CFLAGS = -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > Is this a bug in glibc or should I use binutils 2.11 (without the |
| 26 |
> > combreloc tweak)? |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > Thanks in advance, |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > Niek. |
| 31 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
| 32 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 33 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 34 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 39 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives