1 |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 08 February 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: |
3 |
> > How would you then reconcile the issues raised in this bug[1] |
4 |
> > regarding /usr/lib and multilib support? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> /usr/lib/misc most likely, or /usr/libexec as you prefer, considering that the |
7 |
> policy about that is still unwritten and probably will not appear in the next |
8 |
> few months either. |
9 |
|
10 |
My only fear with going with /usr/lib/misc or /usr/libexec is that |
11 |
the actual move won't be pretty (I'll have to come up with some |
12 |
way for users to migrate some config files), so I'd prefer to only have |
13 |
to do it once. |
14 |
|
15 |
That's why I want to be sure I consider every viable option and pick the |
16 |
best location: so it's less likely I have to do it all again in 6 |
17 |
months. |
18 |
|
19 |
Then again, maybe my migration strategy will be so good it will be easy |
20 |
to do a second time :) |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Jim Ramsay |
24 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox) |