Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Sets in the tree | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:33:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130814163345.1cb049e5@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Sets in the tree by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:29:00 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 | > Sergey Popov posted on Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400 as excerpted: |
| 4 | > > Why [were sets] not added as a part of the PMS? Some implementation |
| 5 | > > flaws? Or maybe, architecture problems? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > [TL;DR folks, skip to last paragraph summary.] |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Most of this is wrong. I'd recommend skipping the whole thing. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |