| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 01:13:58 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I know exactly which standard -ffast-math violates (IEEE/ISO floating |
| 5 |
>> point spec) and how (the man page is quite complete about this), |
| 6 |
>> --as-needed doesn't have any warning about this, there isn't any |
| 7 |
>> standard that it violates since it's the default behavior at least |
| 8 |
>> for 2 platform (one from those who wrote most of the ELF spec...). |
| 9 |
>> Point the spec, and the paragraph violated. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> ISO/IEC 14882:1998 section 3.7.1 paragraph 2. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
"If an object of static storage duration has initialization or a |
| 15 |
destructor with side effects, it shall not be eliminated even if |
| 16 |
it appears to be unused, except that a class object or its copy |
| 17 |
may be eliminated as specified in 12.8." |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Unchanged in the 2003 revision. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Is that related to linking? I don't think so. Still, PE and ELF are |
| 22 |
older than the first C++ spec so, IFF your reading of this chapter is |
| 23 |
correct, C++ is broken by design. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
lu |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Luca Barbato |
| 30 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 31 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 32 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives