| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it |
| 5 |
> > is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I'm not sure whether it is worth having a separate package for the |
| 8 |
> > service scripts in this case. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That would depend on where the service scripts are sitting, I guess -- |
| 11 |
> do you mean here that openrc will keep its current tmpfiles.dev and |
| 12 |
> tmpfiles.setup scripts? If that's the case wouldn't openrc need to |
| 13 |
> RDEPEND or PDEPEND on virtual/tmpfiles ? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
No, those scripts will be removed from OpenRC. If you grep through |
| 16 |
OpenRC, you will see that once they are removed, they are never actually |
| 17 |
referred to by any other services that are part of OpenRC. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The scripts will be put in opentmpfiles and that ebuild will install |
| 20 |
them. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
William |
Archives