| 1 |
On 04/07/2010 11:00 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 2 |
>> 5. centralize developer documentation |
| 3 |
>> ===================================== |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> This is an interesting idea which I believe I have seen discussed on |
| 6 |
> irc at some point. Feel free to work on a GLEP to address that. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
To be honest, this doesn't even need a GLEP so much as a website or |
| 10 |
something. If somebody consolidated all this stuff into a reasonable |
| 11 |
format, I bet that half the devs would pitch in and make their |
| 12 |
contributions. The only thing that might warrant a GLEP is a policy |
| 13 |
decision that all development policies must be documented or linked from |
| 14 |
that site to be binding, or something like that. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I don't think that for the council to make a policy decision that there |
| 17 |
needs to be a GLEP. Sure, it is the best way to make big changes, or |
| 18 |
changes that require some level of formality. However, the council can |
| 19 |
still show leadership in affirming their agreement on issues even if it |
| 20 |
isn't a formal affair. I'm sure every other town government in the |
| 21 |
Western World has taken a vote in support of their troops or something |
| 22 |
like that without going through the official lawmaking process and all |
| 23 |
that - it is just a gesture. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I don't have the time to create such a website although I would agree |
| 26 |
that it is sorely needed. Hence, I will try to be careful in throwing |
| 27 |
around criticism - it is much easier to bring problems to the table than |
| 28 |
solutions... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Rich |
Archives