| 1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining |
| 4 |
> new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and |
| 5 |
> hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose |
| 6 |
> that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed |
| 7 |
> property definition and they would also be able to write in one or |
| 8 |
> more alternative names for the definition. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That makes a lot of sense, although I'm not sure you need to get consensus |
| 11 |
on which properties should be introduced: if the pm teams all agree a flag |
| 12 |
is needed, it should be in, imo. Names would be better to throw out for |
| 13 |
wider consensus, due to the i18n and the fact that pm users will need to |
| 14 |
type them in.. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> I don't know what the |
| 17 |
> best method(s) to carry out a vote like this would be. Does anybody |
| 18 |
> have any suggestions? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
How about a poll in "portage & programming" for each flag under |
| 21 |
consideration, with options for names being considered? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You could add a "Some other name which I will suggest in a post" option. |
| 24 |
"No this flag is a bad idea" should come from the dev ml imo, with the |
| 25 |
reasons explained and discussed fully. |
Archives