1 |
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200 |
3 |
> Dawid Węgliński <cla@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to |
6 |
>> work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that are not supposed |
7 |
>> to work isn't good. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> We have a "testing" branch and a "stable" branch, defined by the |
10 |
> KEYWORDS variable in the ebuilds. Package.masking stuff saying you're |
11 |
> "testing" is at the least uninformative and highly confusing and |
12 |
> unfriendly to would-be testers when in the very same context this |
13 |
> already means something different (namely, it's been too short a |
14 |
> while, wait one or two months for this version to go stable, as the |
15 |
> ~arch keywords would suggest). |
16 |
|
17 |
~arch has always been for testing ebuilds; not packages. You should |
18 |
not be using ~arch to test stuff you know doesn't work; that is what |
19 |
package.mask is for; to prevent users from accidentally installing |
20 |
broken shit. |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> The same term shouldn't be used to denote two ways of masking ebuilds, |
24 |
> but that's beside the point of providing good reasons to package.mask |
25 |
> ebuilds. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I completely agree that useful messages in package.mask are important. |
29 |
|
30 |
-Alec |
31 |
|
32 |
>> > Even saying that it would kill puppies would be more valid. Just be |
33 |
>> > honest and tell people what is going on. Tell them that if they use |
34 |
>> > Opera snapshots, they shouldn't care about losing mail or experience |
35 |
>> > frequent crashes while browsing. Anything really, just don't tell |
36 |
>> > them you're "testing" or you find yourself excluding them from the |
37 |
>> > party with a really bad excuse. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> This is the place i agree with you. Anyway i think package still |
40 |
>> should be p.masked with good explanation of why it is masked. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Welcome to the starting point of this thread! ;-) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Kind regards, |
46 |
> JeR |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |