| 1 |
On 10/30/2015 06:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> We have no way of saying 'I prefer polarssl, then gnutls, then |
| 4 |
> libressl, and never openssl'. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I don't think this is something that can be reasonably supported and it |
| 7 |
sounds awfully automagic. And I don't see how this is possible right |
| 8 |
now, so I'm not really sure what you expect to get worse. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
E.g. -gnutls pulling in dev-libs/openssl is not really something you'd |
| 11 |
expect. If we go for provider USE flags, then things become consistent, |
| 12 |
explicit and unambiguous. The only problem is our crappy implementation |
| 13 |
of providers USE flags via REQUIRED_USE. |
Archives