1 |
On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:18:04 -0500 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Not sure I'm following, but I will be the first to admit that I'm a |
4 |
> > git novice. Would this be aided by a convention, like only |
5 |
> > committing to master on the gentoo official repository, and any |
6 |
> > on-the-side work on places like github/etc stays in branches? |
7 |
> > Those repositories would just keep getting fed commits on master |
8 |
> > from the official repository. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Iagree with this; I think we should ban merge commits on master. That |
11 |
> would force everyone to rebase their work on current master before |
12 |
> they commit to master which would make the history clean. |
13 |
|
14 |
So what's the point of switching to git if you want to ban the main |
15 |
reason git exists? |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |