1 |
Honestly, giving the mplayer peoples preoccupation with the legality of |
2 |
what they are doing, if they are providing the downloading, I have no |
3 |
doubt it is completely legal. |
4 |
|
5 |
I know OpenDivx (not sure if this is what divx4linux is based on or not) |
6 |
had a no binary-distribution license, but src was acceptable. Im hunting |
7 |
around on the mplayer site right now to try to find a definative answer. |
8 |
|
9 |
--Todd |
10 |
|
11 |
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
12 |
|
13 |
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:50:49 +0200 |
14 |
> Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Maybe they should be marked RESTRICT="nomirror" |
19 |
> |
20 |
> But they would still be dependencies in that case. Maybe a "non-free" |
21 |
> USE flag could be useful for such situations. (Btw, is it possible to |
22 |
> have dependencies depending on several USE flags, like x86 & non-free |
23 |
> here?) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> -- |
27 |
> Thomas de Grenier de Latour. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |