1 |
* Travis Tilley (lv@g.o) wrote: |
2 |
> just a heads up - i've moved all the 2.6 header packages to |
3 |
> sys-kernel/linux26-headers so that they can be keyworded without having them |
4 |
> accidentally install on the system of a 2.4 kernel user. hopefully soon this |
5 |
> will mean we can unmask the newer glibc ebuilds on x86, which have a dep on |
6 |
> the 2.6 headers when using nptl (instead of using /usr/src/linux, which is |
7 |
> problematic at best and quite often broken at worst). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> another note re: NPTL is that nptl no longer has a version number of it's own |
10 |
> as of 2004-06-29. i'm guessing this means that ulrich drepper considers nptl |
11 |
> to be fairly stable, but i dont think i'll be so quick to put words in his |
12 |
> mouth. when i'm sure that everything's good and calm with the linux26-headers |
13 |
> change i'll poke at making a new snapshot to see if it passes "make check" |
14 |
> yet. :) |
15 |
|
16 |
Following the announcement that the linux26 headers were now ~x86, I |
17 |
decided to try them, along with the migration to nptl. After a (longish |
18 |
;-) ) emerge -e system, everything seems to work fine (I just had some |
19 |
trouble starting X, but emerging nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel solved |
20 |
it). |
21 |
|
22 |
I know this is just a WFM message, but it might encourage others to try |
23 |
it. |
24 |
|
25 |
Alan Schmitt |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. |
29 |
.O. |
30 |
..O |
31 |
OOO |