Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:03:49
Message-Id: 4FE46D02.9010104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot by Richard Yao
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 21/06/12 08:24 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 06:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> we're a DISTRO - we integrate and ship what upstream gives us... > > RHEL is a distribution, but I understand that RedHat does a great > deal of upstream programming and is also upstream for some things. > Do you consider it to be inappropriate for us to play a larger role > in both upstream development and as upstream ourselves? >
As a gentoo developer in general? Absolutely not. Through discussion on this list specifically? possibly. :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk/kbQEACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDCrAEAquDX0hrTUufGqXhSG2Cv+yLU bmw3WpMa17OHSmbZ+3QA/Am2K80tHFGDA7uklTUm6Lxe8wynVRTNrmpD93qTlJ4R =gO47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----