Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:03:49
Message-Id: 4FE46D02.9010104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot by Richard Yao
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 21/06/12 08:24 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
5 > On 06/21/2012 06:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
6 >> we're a DISTRO - we integrate and ship what upstream gives us...
7 >
8 > RHEL is a distribution, but I understand that RedHat does a great
9 > deal of upstream programming and is also upstream for some things.
10 > Do you consider it to be inappropriate for us to play a larger role
11 > in both upstream development and as upstream ourselves?
12 >
13
14 As a gentoo developer in general? Absolutely not. Through discussion
15 on this list specifically? possibly. :)
16
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
19
20 iF4EAREIAAYFAk/kbQEACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDCrAEAquDX0hrTUufGqXhSG2Cv+yLU
21 bmw3WpMa17OHSmbZ+3QA/Am2K80tHFGDA7uklTUm6Lxe8wynVRTNrmpD93qTlJ4R
22 =gO47
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----