Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new portage categories
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:56:47
Message-Id: 20080207205643.GA27711@comet.science.oregonstate.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new portage categories by Alec Warner
1 On 15:12 Wed 06 Feb , Alec Warner wrote:
2 > On 2/4/08, Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@×××××××××.cc> wrote:
3 > > On 2/4/08, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
4 > > > On 20:11 Mon 04 Feb , Jonas Bernoulli wrote:
5 > > > > Thinking about it again I would say tags and categories just fulfill
6 > > > > different purposes. Tags can not replace categories but might be a
7 > > > > useful extension to categories for the tasks I described, not more not
8 > > > > less. They are not better or worse, just different:)
9 > > >
10 > > > Why don't you think they can replace categories?
11 > >
12 > > Quick answer: Because there are packages with the same name in
13 > > different categories. How would tags deal with that?
14 >
15 > Techincally you could enforce UNIQUE(pkg,[tags]), I agree thats a poor
16 > constraint though ;)
17
18 I would probably print the ambiguous package name, with info on each
19 package, and a list of tags unique to each that could be used to specify
20 which one you want. Perhaps a numbered list too.
21
22 Thanks,
23 Donnie
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] new portage categories Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>