From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc() | ||
Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:10:37 | ||
Message-Id: | CAEdQ38F_bD7vTNw3T5WouBCNEeLYo1azFsj7KEBrEnkmCOSqVw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc() by Alec Warner |
1 | On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > In terms of 'following Gentoo policy.' We encourage packages to be as |
3 | > close to upstream as possible. I cannot fathom why when you basically |
4 | > find a performance bug in malloc, you start a thread on the list about |
5 | > replacing it; as opposed to filing a bug against glibc or emailing the |
6 | > glibc lists and asking them about it. |
7 | |
8 | We may not understand it, but it does completely fit ryao's typical |
9 | modus operandi. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc() | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |