1 |
Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name> posted |
2 |
1198537244.2806.13.camel@××××××××××××××.name, excerpted below, on Mon, 24 |
3 |
Dec 2007 23:00:44 +0000: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 21:39 +0000, Duncan wrote: |
6 |
>> Apparently, at present, pretty much the only one with access is the one |
7 |
>> who actually did the port, and he's hasn't done much with it since. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I beg to differ - I've down an awful lot with the code. |
10 |
|
11 |
I guess I was a bit ambiguous as I had mentioned your project in passing, |
12 |
but that remark as quoted was intended to apply to the Gentoo PMS repo, |
13 |
not your RC project (which I know has seen progress as I've been |
14 |
following the blog). |
15 |
|
16 |
Sorry for the confusion. |
17 |
|
18 |
> Granted I'm waiting on Gentoo Infra to host it (the git repo) because |
19 |
> that is what we agreed. However I'm probably going to end up going with |
20 |
> someone else, or hosting myself, because it's now coming up to 2 months |
21 |
> and nothings ready yet. |
22 |
|
23 |
... So the remark, while intended for the Gentoo PMS repo, would seem to |
24 |
apply to the Gentoo repo for your project as well... Not to be hard on |
25 |
infra here, just reality, which must be dealt with. |
26 |
|
27 |
> Heck, my retirement bug [1] is still pending and |
28 |
> I currently have full access to all my accounts on various boxes. So |
29 |
> either I'm a very trustable guy that you really don't want to retire |
30 |
> (tough, I have) or some people are slacking. |
31 |
|
32 |
>From all the discussion I've seen, you /are/ trusted. The arrangement |
33 |
they are working on for you is the first of its kind (probably one reason |
34 |
it's taking the time it is), and I don't think something they'd have |
35 |
considered for just anyone. (If you note, the PMS repo thing, which they |
36 |
are treating similar, is documentation, not code, certainly not code that |
37 |
has been and will continue to be at the core of very close to every |
38 |
Gentoo box out there.) |
39 |
|
40 |
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199318 |
41 |
|
42 |
I expect that's showing in the "lack of haste" in closing the retirement |
43 |
bug as well. You are still trusted and your code will continue to be at |
44 |
the center of Gentoo for the foreseeable future, so regardless of dev |
45 |
access or not you could still screw Gentoo over if that was your intent, |
46 |
and given that, well, there are just more pressing matters to attend to. |
47 |
|
48 |
That said, while flattered, I'd be bugged about it too if it were me. I |
49 |
know I'm sermonizing the choir here but crackers love stale but still |
50 |
active accounts, and it remains your name on the line, so yeah, there's |
51 |
reason for concern. |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
55 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
56 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
57 |
|
58 |
-- |
59 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |