Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 21:50:13
Message-Id: 4FBD5B42.7090809@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Dan Douglas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/23/2012 11:14 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 04:47:04 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> 2. rsync generation is NOT going away. Users will still be using >> it.
First, I'd stick with the current rsync to spread the tree (mirror work and mirrors+regular rsync users shouldn't notice any backend switch at all).
> Would users have a way of gaining read-only access? This would be > EXTREMELY helpful.
Sure, this would be possible like any other git checkout (layman-git-overlays, github.com, etc.). Please compare (browsing source and access description) http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/ http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+9W0EACgkQknrdDGLu8JADaQD+KC6cLJ5LqpNrKkNEBT1kAvJW xn+ZcfcMGJzc8GPyQZAA/jKug+5/DlDAHVGBIjAJOi9xf4EFqroL4eyPY8SD2neh =dvFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>