Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] correct package depends
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:20:56
Message-Id: 3F8ED48A.7070507@technaut.darktalker.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] correct package depends by Eldad Zack
1 Eldad Zack wrote:
2 >>>>in the ebuild for mplayer and assumes it depends on it. I want mplayer to not show up in
3 >>>>that list because it does *not* depend on arts since it was compiled without support for it.
4 >>>
5 >>>Ok, I hopefully got you now.
6 >>>I've worked it out but I'm not sure if it breaks the check on uninstalled
7 >>>packages.
8 >>>
9 >>>I've attached the patch to qpkg.
10 >>>
11 >>>Hope I got you right this time. :)
12 >>>
13 >>
14 >>Much, much closer. The only thing that shows up in the list now as dependent on arts is
15 >>avidemux. While it is the same issue, in the ebuild, it has:
16 >>
17 >> arts? ( >=kde-base/arts-1.1.1 )
18 >>
19 >>in the DEPEND line which probably messes something up. Other than that, your patch works
20 >>great! You really should submit that patch on Bugzilla.
21 >
22 >
23 > Right, it's the ">=" that I didn't include in the regex that wipe the
24 > false dependency out.
25 > That's my bad, I should've used the predefined [:punct:] regex type
26 > before.
27 >
28 > I've submitted the whole patch against vanilla qpkg on Bugzilla.
29 >
30 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31290
31
32 Very nice. I really do need to learn how to really use bash, grep, egrep, sed, awk, etc.
33
34 --
35 Andrew Gaffney
36
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] correct package depends Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××××××××××.net>