| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> James Cloos wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live |
| 6 |
>>>> ebuilds. Git-9999 is the one I remember. |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likely |
| 9 |
>>>> to be in active use notwithstanding their keywording or masking. |
| 10 |
>>> Their maintainers should be active and switch their ebuilds to EAPI 2. |
| 11 |
>>> If they don't have an active maintainer, then do we want to keep live |
| 12 |
>>> ebuilds for them around? |
| 13 |
>> Your stated goal was to remove unused ebuilds, which live ebuilds are not, |
| 14 |
>> regardless of the status of the maintainer. And I'm pretty sure git has an |
| 15 |
>> active maintainer. :P |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> indeed. you really should file bugs for these instead of deleting ebuilds on |
| 18 |
> people who missed a thread on gentoo-dev. |
| 19 |
> -mike |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
All developers are required to follow gentoo-dev-announce. If they don't |
| 22 |
follow that, it can't be expected for them to follow bugzilla either. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Petteri |
Archives