Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Latest Sawfish snapshot building for anyone? Spyder?
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 20:38:27
Message-Id: 20020528033815.6c6040ac.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Latest Sawfish snapshot building for anyone? Spyder? by g.gabriele79@genie.it
1 rumour.
2
3 I've been in touch with the release team and they have recieved the bug
4 reports now, should be some progress..
5 it seems the sawfish maintainer is Missing In Action for now, vacancy
6 for any lisp haxor out there ;)
7
8
9 //Spider
10
11 begin quote
12 On Mon, 27 May 2002 23:34:33 +0000
13 <g.gabriele79@×××××.it> wrote:
14
15 >
16 > >
17 > > Da: Spider <spider@g.o>
18 > > Data: 2002/05/27 Mon PM 11:28:25 GMT
19 > > A: gentoo-dev@g.o
20 > > Oggetto: Re: [gentoo-dev] Latest Sawfish snapshot building for
21 > > anyone? Spyder?
22 > >
23 > >
24 > >
25 > > begin quote
26 > > On Mon, 27 May 2002 12:15:33 -0700
27 > > "Scott A. Friedman" <friedman@××××.edu> wrote:
28 > >
29 > > > Hi
30 > > >
31 > > > I unmasked gnome2 and build went smoothly. However, I prefer to
32 > > > stick with sawfish for now (since that is what I know).
33 > > >
34 > > > Trying to emerge sawfish-20020524 and it (and the preceeding
35 > > > ebuild) fails while trying to compile the lisp components. Before
36 > > > I log this as a bug I thought I'd check for comments here.
37 > > >
38 > > If you read the changelog....
39 > >
40 > > file bugs with sawfish in bugzilla.gnome.org, the may snapshots have
41 > > been completely broken, which is why I've decided to go with
42 > > metacity for Gentoo Gnome2 releases
43 > >
44 > > //Spider
45 >
46 > Rumors are also saying that metacity will be the default gnome2 WM,
47 > and that the sawfish development will be dropped.... Who knows.
48 >
49 > - stroke
50 >
51 >
52 > Segreterie VIP: attori, comici, personaggi TV!
53 > Voci famose rispondono per te!
54 > Scoprile qui http://genie.omitech.it/voicemail/
55 >
56 >
57
58
59 --
60 begin .signature
61 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
62 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
63 end