1 |
> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:04, Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: |
4 |
>> Hello, |
5 |
>> =20 |
6 |
>> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to |
7 |
>> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported" |
8 |
>> architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with |
9 |
>> the general architecture support in Gentoo, e.g. by having all |
10 |
>> architectures with stable profiles be "security supported". |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I fully support this approach and have long advocated for it. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Overall, all stables arches should be security supported and if |
16 |
> they begin lagging behind they should be dropped to unstable. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I am sure there are some nuances, but this is a great start. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Let's do it! |
21 |
|
22 |
+1 for reasons you said + in the original proposal. |
23 |
|
24 |
We don't currently adhere to the stated policy verbatim |
25 |
anyway and I don't think it adds anything right now. |
26 |
|
27 |
best, |
28 |
sam |