1 |
On Sunday 15 April 2012 21:04:01 Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would |
4 |
> > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug |
5 |
> > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by |
6 |
> > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug |
7 |
> > reports). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical |
10 |
> cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full |
11 |
> atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail. |
12 |
|
13 |
+1 |
14 |
|
15 |
i'm a bit more anal and generally prefer it to be the first item in the summary |
16 |
as it makes scanning through summaries much easier. having an arbitrary |
17 |
series of words before it makes it a bit harder imo. |
18 |
-mike |