| 1 |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:37:01 +0100 |
| 2 |
Thomas Pani <thomas.pani@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> As cat/pkg-ver ultimately is ONE file in the filesystem, there's no |
| 4 |
> reason to put any information about the EAPI in the filename. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sure there is. It's the sanest place to put it such that it's available |
| 7 |
when it's needed -- that is, before the ebuild is sourced. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I still don't get why EAPI=xxx is soooo bad. Obviously the GLEP (and |
| 10 |
> the last 500 comments lack to explain that. Ebuilds are bash. |
| 11 |
> EAPI=xxx is bash syntax. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Uh, I've explained it far too many times in this thread already. Go |
| 14 |
back and read. Don't post again until you understand it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives