1 |
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:47:27 +0200 |
2 |
Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even |
4 |
> stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils, |
5 |
> app-admin/system-config- printer-common) - I think it should be: |
6 |
|
7 |
Well you'd marked them "~arch", right? That means they're candidates to |
8 |
go stable. |
9 |
|
10 |
> * solely up to the package maintainers to stabilize application on |
11 |
> arches they're using or on any arch if package is arch-agnostic |
12 |
> (optionally, but preferably with some peer review from other project |
13 |
> members or arch team members). |
14 |
|
15 |
There are no arch agnostic packages. |
16 |
|
17 |
> It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some |
18 |
> random php/perl library that's known to work. |
19 |
|
20 |
How do you know it works if you don't test on the arch in question? |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |