Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:13:18
Message-Id: 1481134383.2818.65.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag by Ian Stakenvicius
1 El mié, 07-12-2016 a las 10:27 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
2 >
3 [...]
4 > There is only one instance of a dependency atom that requires the
5 > tinfo flag to be disabled, and that package is an old game whos build
6 > system and ebuild is flawed in this regard.  All others are fine with
7 > the flag being enabled so far as I can tell (and if they're not then
8 > it's a bug that needs to be addressed anyhow).
9 >
10
11 Looking to this tracker bug there would be more packages needing to be
12 fixed (and probably a more recent tinderbox would be needed)
13 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457530
14
15 But looking more deeply to Fedora and openSuSE, they seem to not face
16 this breakage even enabling tinfo :/, but, at least on openSuSE, they
17 seem to play some "black magic" in the ncurses .pc files to probably
18 not cause this issue as I see in their .spec file:
19 http://download.opensuse.org/tumbleweed/repo/src-oss/suse/src/ncurses-6
20 .0-16.1.src.rpm