1 |
On the one ebuild I've sumbitted, the dev that committed it added a line |
2 |
for |
3 |
DEPEND="virtual/glibc" |
4 |
|
5 |
What wouldn't depend on glibc, isn't that a given? A quick scan |
6 |
through the portage directory turns up: |
7 |
# find /usr/portage/ -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs grep "virtual/glibc" |
8 |
| wc -l |
9 |
1982 |
10 |
# find /usr/portage/ -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs grep -v "virtual/glibc" |
11 |
| wc -l |
12 |
406821 |
13 |
|
14 |
So most ebuilds don't do this anyway. What's the rule of thumb for |
15 |
adding this as a dep? |
16 |
|
17 |
On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 21:30, Alastair Tse wrote: |
18 |
> Hi, |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I've written up a list of common mistakes that users make when |
21 |
> submitting ebuilds to us for inclusion. This stems from the discussion |
22 |
> earlier on the list about the quality of user-submitted ebuilds. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |