| 1 |
Maybe because ALSA has a superior API, support for more soundcards, uses less |
| 2 |
resources, is going to be the default soundsystem in Linux 2.6? |
| 3 |
ALSA itself is not buggy, it's some of the apps' ALSA-"support" that is |
| 4 |
buggy... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Try to access the emu10k1 sequencer with the standard OSS-modules.. |
| 7 |
Total kernel freeze! :P At least with the lowlatency and preemptive patches |
| 8 |
installed.. (I haven't tested without them) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
// Wigren |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Monday 17 June 2002 01.11 skrev Bart Verwilst: |
| 13 |
> On Monday 17 June 2002 01:00, John A. Ouzts wrote: |
| 14 |
> || I believe there will be some pent up demand for a HOWTO on getting sound |
| 15 |
> || to work using KDE 3.0.1. and alsa 0.9, when a fix comes and alsa support |
| 16 |
> || goes back into KDE. I suspect virtually all KDE users will be in need of |
| 17 |
> || specific instructions for getting sound back. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> For getting sound back?? |
| 20 |
> I never used alsa in my life, and still i've always enjoyed sound on my KDE |
| 21 |
> systems, without any hassle whatsoever... I can't understand why anybody |
| 22 |
> would want to use something as (apparently) bugridden and hard to setup as |
| 23 |
> alsa, when he can just compile his sounddrivers in the kernel, and let arts |
| 24 |
> do all the work... |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> just my 2 cents |
Archives