| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> There's no reason we /can't/ have a comparable process for CVS to |
| 3 |
> eliminate needless slopping of files around in pastebins/emails, both |
| 4 |
> of which are time consuming and not designed for doing exactly that. |
| 5 |
>... |
| 6 |
>(lots of descriptions of fancy tools to make cvs more bearable) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If people are looking to improve Gentoo's tools it would be far more |
| 9 |
productive for them to help out with the git migration. Can I stop |
| 10 |
somebody from making gerrit-for-cvs? No. I won't even try - Gentoo |
| 11 |
is about choice. However, the fact is that git is the future, and |
| 12 |
we're probably one of the only serious FOSS projects around still |
| 13 |
using cvs (largely because it doesn't hamper us as much as it hampers |
| 14 |
everybody else). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
We're really not that far from having a working git implementation. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives