| 1 |
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:46:05 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > The only specification-compliant yaml parser is written in C, has |
| 5 |
> > only the bottom two layers of the stack and no usable external |
| 6 |
> > bindings... Perhaps you mean "something that's basically yaml except |
| 7 |
> > with reserved string-start characters not handled correctly", in |
| 8 |
> > which case there's Syck... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> what about libyaml? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
libyaml's the compliant one, but it only supports the bottom part of the |
| 13 |
stack. You'd still have to write the composer and constructor by hand, |
| 14 |
which is a lot of work. It also can't read many documents generated by |
| 15 |
Syck because it's strictly specification compliant and rejects invalid |
| 16 |
input. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Yaml looks nicer than XML on the surface, but unfortunately it's still a |
| 19 |
pain in the ass to handle... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives