| 1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> But the main problem with it is that most upstream requirements.txt, |
| 4 |
> etc.,... all use the infix method. And I hate to say it, but more |
| 5 |
> and more so-called "package management" systems (mostly language |
| 6 |
> specific ones) all use that method. So transitioning to that, should |
| 7 |
> make package maintenance easier. Possibly even have some automation |
| 8 |
> tools to check them during version bumps, etc... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
But certainly any such automated tools would do a complete parsing of |
| 11 |
the grammar? Because then conversion from infix to prefix notation or |
| 12 |
vice versa is trivial. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ulrich |
Archives