Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Sam James <sam@g.o>, base-system@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] unpacker.eclass: support >=app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.0 for lzip decompression
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 22:06:06
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43ifWTaNdpk9Bwv1xgpO-OCfqbt40sRUsbixh+A+4x9cQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] unpacker.eclass: support >=app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.0 for lzip decompression by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:40 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > >>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Sam James wrote:
4 >
5 > > *.lz)
6 > > - d="|| ( app-arch/plzip app-arch/pdlzip app-arch/lzip )" ;;
7 > > + d="
8 > > + || (
9 > > + >=app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.0
10 > > + app-arch/plzip
11 > > + app-arch/pdlzip
12 > > + app-arch/lzip
13 > > + )
14 > > + "
15 > > + ;;
16 >
17 > Shouldn't all consumers with a dependency on lzip be revbumped?
18 > Otherwise emerge --depclean (in the default configuration) won't drop
19 > lzip.
20
21 That seems like an extreme solution to a problem nobody really cares about.