1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:15 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>At the moment, I'm used to just clicking the Reply button to send to the |
5 |
>>list... however, on most lists that I participate in, Reply-To is left |
6 |
>>alone, so I'm normally in the habit of clicking Reply-To-All. Seeing as |
7 |
>>I normally have to consciously think *click Reply, not RTA*, I for one |
8 |
>>certainly won't miss not having Reply-to-All. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Reply-to-All is evil. You should be using Reply-to-List. I know that I |
12 |
> sure don't need to get the same email both on and off-list. Off-list |
13 |
> emails should be reserved only for when you explicitly do not want to |
14 |
> send to the list and only to the original email's author. |
15 |
|
16 |
Well... someone should tell the Thunderbird people that... I'm still |
17 |
hunting for the "Reply To List" button, and I've been looking for months. |
18 |
|
19 |
Actually, some mailing list managers actually are intelligent enough to |
20 |
not forward on an email if you're CC'ed. (Mailman comes to mind) I |
21 |
agree, having messages sent in duplicate can be annoying, but its not |
22 |
that hard to read one and delete the other. ;-) |
23 |
|
24 |
Besides, normally I filter out the user's email address if I know |
25 |
they're subscribed. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
29 |
| Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | |
30 |
| Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | |
31 |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | |
32 |
| I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | |
33 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |