1 |
Hi gang. |
2 |
|
3 |
Finally all the issues with blas-* and lapack-* packages have been resolved. |
4 |
All these packages are in the tree and unmasked (~x86, ~amd64 and some ~ppc) |
5 |
and the corresponding virtuals were enabled. |
6 |
These ebuilds provide parallel installation of reference or atlas based |
7 |
libraries, shared libs and few more niceties, plus they have some issues with |
8 |
gcc/f77 resolved. This is to say that they are the preferred blas/atlas |
9 |
ebuilds and old stuff (app-sci/{blas,atlas,lapack}) is deprecated as of now. |
10 |
|
11 |
ATTN: sci devs and maintainers of packages that use blas or lapack. |
12 |
Please update your ebuilds to depend on virtual/blas or virtual/lapack. |
13 |
Switching between active implementation is performed with blas-config or |
14 |
lapack-config scripts, that follow gcc-config convention |
15 |
(see app-config --help for more details). |
16 |
|
17 |
Q to libtool maintainers: when can we expect >=sys-devel/libtool-1.5 going |
18 |
stable on x86 and ppc? Some rough idea would be wellcome as it is hollding |
19 |
these packages from going stable as well. |
20 |
|
21 |
George |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |