1 |
Tomáš Chvátal posted on Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:29:52 +0200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Guys, |
4 |
> the policy makes perfect sense, there are people that sync just monthly, |
5 |
> so they might want to get some headsup why their packages are going |
6 |
> away, and not just remove them. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Thats why the recommended value is 60 days, 30 for urgent cases, lately |
9 |
> we just moved to 30 for everything, but please stick with that, |
10 |
> do not make it lower. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> This is not about waiting for maintainer, or slowing up distro, but |
13 |
> letting our users to catch up with what we do. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> As a side note masked packages CAN be broken, so the stab can proceed |
16 |
> from the point you mask all the broken ones. |
17 |
|
18 |
++ |
19 |
|
20 |
Mask it now, do the libpng thing in 14 days (or even sooner if all to-be- |
21 |
broken packages are masked), but leave the masked packages for the full |
22 |
30 days as the policy states. |
23 |
|
24 |
Libpng isn't held up that way, while the package still gets its 30 day |
25 |
masking last-rites. No policy broken; no maintainer toes stepped on as a |
26 |
result of the broken policy. No more nasty threads about (this) broken |
27 |
policy and unhappy maintainers as a result! =:^) |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
31 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
32 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |