1 |
On 17/01/15 16:03, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:59:08 +0800 |
3 |
> Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> The problem isn't the constants, though. The problem is the |
5 |
>>> resolution algorithm. There's not much point tweaking performance |
6 |
>>> until the resolver is fixed to produce a correct answer... |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Patches welcome :) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> If I send you a patch that updates all the documentation to use Paludis |
11 |
> rather than Portage, will you welcome it? |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
If you rewrite paludis in C99 or equally language with non-brittle |
15 |
runtime (libc++ isn't really viable yet =/) I would seriously consider it. |
16 |
|
17 |
lu |