| 1 |
On 5/26/13 4:58 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> The way it's being proposed (and please correct me if i'm wrong), the |
| 3 |
> wrapper is a direct replacement binary (small C program) for all init |
| 4 |
> systems, and would based on some configuration file or whatnot |
| 5 |
> determine and exec the init system it's supposed to -- and make any |
| 6 |
> other necessary changes too, such as switching /etc/inittab) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The really minimal wrapper would be something like |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
#!/bin/sh |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
INIT=/bin/init |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
if [[ -e /etc/switch-init ]]; then |
| 15 |
. /etc/switch-init |
| 16 |
fi |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
exec ${INIT} |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
With switch-init doing stuff needed, including remounting the rootfs rw |
| 21 |
if there are stuff to be changed and if we want stick to symlinks it |
| 22 |
could replace itself by a symlink. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Yes, it would be that simple. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
lu |
Archives