From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update | ||
Date: | Wed, 11 Sep 2013 08:23:36 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130911082324.GU29797@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update by Gilles Dartiguelongue |
1 | On 11-09-2013 10:51:22 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
2 | > > > shouldn't that be EROOT ? |
3 | > > |
4 | > > and ED in that case too |
5 | > |
6 | > Do we still use that in EAPI > 3 ? |
7 | |
8 | EROOT = ROOT + EPREFIX |
9 | ED = D + EPREFIX |
10 | |
11 | Unless I misunderstand your question, that means "yes, we do" to me. |
12 | |
13 | Fabian |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Fabian Groffen |
18 | Gentoo on a different level |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |